Lansing Ignite logo

Football statistics for Lansing Ignite

Team Info

Season

2019

Country

USA

Over Under Goals

#TeamMPOver 2.5OverallHomeAway
1
Toronto II logo

Toronto II

281761%71%50%
2
Richmond Kickers logo

Richmond Kickers

281139%36%43%
3
Orlando City II logo

Orlando City II

281450%57%43%
4
FC Tucson logo

FC Tucson

281450%50%50%
5
South Georgia Tormenta FC logo

South Georgia Tormenta FC

281139%50%29%
6
Greenville Triumph logo

Greenville Triumph

30930%29%31%
7
Lansing Ignite logo

Lansing Ignite

291552%47%57%
8
Forward Madison logo

Forward Madison

291034%21%47%
9
North Texas logo

North Texas

301653%44%64%
10
Chattanooga Red Wolves logo

Chattanooga Red Wolves

281139%43%36%
#TeamMPOver 0.5OverallHomeAway
1
Toronto II logo

Toronto II

282796%93%100%
2
Richmond Kickers logo

Richmond Kickers

282589%93%86%
3
Orlando City II logo

Orlando City II

282796%93%100%
4
FC Tucson logo

FC Tucson

282693%86%100%
5
South Georgia Tormenta FC logo

South Georgia Tormenta FC

282486%93%79%
6
Greenville Triumph logo

Greenville Triumph

302583%86%81%
7
Lansing Ignite logo

Lansing Ignite

292897%100%93%
8
Forward Madison logo

Forward Madison

292793%93%93%
9
North Texas logo

North Texas

302893%88%100%
10
Chattanooga Red Wolves logo

Chattanooga Red Wolves

282796%100%93%
#TeamMPOver 1.5OverallHomeAway
1
Toronto II logo

Toronto II

282486%79%93%
2
Richmond Kickers logo

Richmond Kickers

281554%64%43%
3
Orlando City II logo

Orlando City II

282279%93%64%
4
FC Tucson logo

FC Tucson

282279%79%79%
5
South Georgia Tormenta FC logo

South Georgia Tormenta FC

281968%79%57%
6
Greenville Triumph logo

Greenville Triumph

301240%36%44%
7
Lansing Ignite logo

Lansing Ignite

292483%80%86%
8
Forward Madison logo

Forward Madison

291552%36%67%
9
North Texas logo

North Texas

302170%63%79%
10
Chattanooga Red Wolves logo

Chattanooga Red Wolves

282071%71%71%
#TeamMPOver 1.5OverallHomeAway
1
Toronto II logo

Toronto II

281346%50%43%
2
Richmond Kickers logo

Richmond Kickers

28725%21%29%
3
Orlando City II logo

Orlando City II

28829%29%29%
4
FC Tucson logo

FC Tucson

281243%50%36%
5
South Georgia Tormenta FC logo

South Georgia Tormenta FC

28725%29%21%
6
Greenville Triumph logo

Greenville Triumph

30827%21%31%
7
Lansing Ignite logo

Lansing Ignite

291138%40%36%
8
Forward Madison logo

Forward Madison

29621%14%27%
9
North Texas logo

North Texas

301447%44%50%
10
Chattanooga Red Wolves logo

Chattanooga Red Wolves

28829%29%29%
#TeamMPOver 1.5OverallHomeAway
1
Toronto II logo

Toronto II

28621%36%7%
2
Richmond Kickers logo

Richmond Kickers

28311%7%14%
3
Orlando City II logo

Orlando City II

28414%14%14%
4
FC Tucson logo

FC Tucson

2827%14%0%
5
South Georgia Tormenta FC logo

South Georgia Tormenta FC

28518%14%21%
6
Greenville Triumph logo

Greenville Triumph

3027%0%13%
7
Lansing Ignite logo

Lansing Ignite

29621%20%21%
8
Forward Madison logo

Forward Madison

29310%7%13%
9
North Texas logo

North Texas

30723%19%29%
10
Chattanooga Red Wolves logo

Chattanooga Red Wolves

28414%14%14%
#TeamMPOver 1.5OverallHomeAway
1
Toronto II logo

Toronto II

2827%14%0%
2
Richmond Kickers logo

Richmond Kickers

2800%0%0%
3
Orlando City II logo

Orlando City II

2800%0%0%
4
FC Tucson logo

FC Tucson

2800%0%0%
5
South Georgia Tormenta FC logo

South Georgia Tormenta FC

2800%0%0%
6
Greenville Triumph logo

Greenville Triumph

3000%0%0%
7
Lansing Ignite logo

Lansing Ignite

2927%7%7%
8
Forward Madison logo

Forward Madison

2900%0%0%
9
North Texas logo

North Texas

3013%0%7%
10
Chattanooga Red Wolves logo

Chattanooga Red Wolves

2814%0%7%
#TeamMPOver 2.5OverallHomeAway
1
Toronto II logo

Toronto II

281139%29%50%
2
Richmond Kickers logo

Richmond Kickers

281761%64%57%
3
Orlando City II logo

Orlando City II

281450%43%57%
4
FC Tucson logo

FC Tucson

281450%50%50%
5
South Georgia Tormenta FC logo

South Georgia Tormenta FC

281761%50%71%
6
Greenville Triumph logo

Greenville Triumph

302170%71%69%
7
Lansing Ignite logo

Lansing Ignite

291448%53%43%
8
Forward Madison logo

Forward Madison

291966%79%53%
9
North Texas logo

North Texas

301447%56%36%
10
Chattanooga Red Wolves logo

Chattanooga Red Wolves

281761%57%64%
#TeamMPOver 2.5OverallHomeAway
1
Toronto II logo

Toronto II

2814%7%0%
2
Richmond Kickers logo

Richmond Kickers

28311%7%14%
3
Orlando City II logo

Orlando City II

2814%7%0%
4
FC Tucson logo

FC Tucson

2827%14%0%
5
South Georgia Tormenta FC logo

South Georgia Tormenta FC

28414%7%21%
6
Greenville Triumph logo

Greenville Triumph

30517%14%19%
7
Lansing Ignite logo

Lansing Ignite

2913%0%7%
8
Forward Madison logo

Forward Madison

2927%7%7%
9
North Texas logo

North Texas

3027%13%0%
10
Chattanooga Red Wolves logo

Chattanooga Red Wolves

2814%0%7%
#TeamMPOver 2.5OverallHomeAway
1
Toronto II logo

Toronto II

28414%21%7%
2
Richmond Kickers logo

Richmond Kickers

281346%36%57%
3
Orlando City II logo

Orlando City II

28621%7%36%
4
FC Tucson logo

FC Tucson

28621%21%21%
5
South Georgia Tormenta FC logo

South Georgia Tormenta FC

28932%21%43%
6
Greenville Triumph logo

Greenville Triumph

301860%64%56%
7
Lansing Ignite logo

Lansing Ignite

29517%20%14%
8
Forward Madison logo

Forward Madison

291448%64%33%
9
North Texas logo

North Texas

30930%38%21%
10
Chattanooga Red Wolves logo

Chattanooga Red Wolves

28829%29%29%
#TeamMPOver 2.5OverallHomeAway
1
Toronto II logo

Toronto II

281554%50%57%
2
Richmond Kickers logo

Richmond Kickers

282175%79%71%
3
Orlando City II logo

Orlando City II

282071%71%71%
4
FC Tucson logo

FC Tucson

281657%50%64%
5
South Georgia Tormenta FC logo

South Georgia Tormenta FC

282175%71%79%
6
Greenville Triumph logo

Greenville Triumph

302273%79%69%
7
Lansing Ignite logo

Lansing Ignite

291862%60%64%
8
Forward Madison logo

Forward Madison

292379%86%73%
9
North Texas logo

North Texas

301653%56%50%
10
Chattanooga Red Wolves logo

Chattanooga Red Wolves

282071%71%71%
#TeamMPOver 2.5OverallHomeAway
1
Toronto II logo

Toronto II

282279%64%93%
2
Richmond Kickers logo

Richmond Kickers

282589%93%86%
3
Orlando City II logo

Orlando City II

282486%86%86%
4
FC Tucson logo

FC Tucson

282693%86%100%
5
South Georgia Tormenta FC logo

South Georgia Tormenta FC

282382%86%79%
6
Greenville Triumph logo

Greenville Triumph

302893%100%88%
7
Lansing Ignite logo

Lansing Ignite

292379%80%79%
8
Forward Madison logo

Forward Madison

292690%93%87%
9
North Texas logo

North Texas

302377%81%71%
10
Chattanooga Red Wolves logo

Chattanooga Red Wolves

282486%86%86%
#TeamMPOver 2.5OverallHomeAway
1
Toronto II logo

Toronto II

282693%86%100%
2
Richmond Kickers logo

Richmond Kickers

2828100%100%100%
3
Orlando City II logo

Orlando City II

2828100%100%100%
4
FC Tucson logo

FC Tucson

2828100%100%100%
5
South Georgia Tormenta FC logo

South Georgia Tormenta FC

2828100%100%100%
6
Greenville Triumph logo

Greenville Triumph

3030100%100%100%
7
Lansing Ignite logo

Lansing Ignite

292793%93%93%
8
Forward Madison logo

Forward Madison

2929100%100%100%
9
North Texas logo

North Texas

302997%100%93%
10
Chattanooga Red Wolves logo

Chattanooga Red Wolves

282796%100%93%

Average goals scored and conceded: Lansing Ignite

Knowing Lansing Ignite’s averages in terms of goals scored and conceded is instrumental in understanding how the team is performing in the USL League One 2019 on both ends of the pitch.

Check out some of the Lansing Ignite’s over/under numbers and goal rates below:

  • 52% of Lansing Ignite games in the league have had 3 or more goals (Lansing Ignite and opponent goals, combined). The percentage of games where matches have had 2 or fewer goals is 48%.

This page can filter the number of goals, from above or below 0.5 goals to 5.5 goals. You can also sort them in ascending and descending order based on the number of times it has occurred, as well as their frequency at home, away from home, and overall in USL League One.

All of this information can help determine how Lansing Ignite’s offence and defence are performing throughout the season. If the goal rate during matches is high, it is important to determine the cause of such a lot of goals going in.

However, it is important to remember that goal percentage statistics cannot be analysed in isolation. Instead, they should be considered alongside several other factors, such as tactics, personnel moves, and others.