03.11.2022 - 11:30
Finished
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 16 | 48% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 16 | 48% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 13 | 39% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 16 | 48% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 16 | 48% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 20 | 61% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 13 | 39% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 18 | 55% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 15 | 45% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 14 | 42% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 18 | 55% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 15 | 45% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 20 | 61% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 14 | 42% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 18 | 55% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 14 | 42% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 17 | 52% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 15 | 45% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 17 | 10 | 59% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 17 | 7 | 41% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 16 | 5 | 31% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 17 | 8 | 47% |
5 | Hangzhou | 16 | 5 | 31% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 17 | 9 | 53% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 16 | 6 | 38% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 17 | 8 | 47% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 16 | 5 | 31% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 16 | 8 | 50% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 16 | 8 | 50% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 17 | 8 | 47% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 17 | 12 | 71% |
14 | Shenzhen | 17 | 6 | 35% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 17 | 11 | 65% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 16 | 10 | 63% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 16 | 9 | 56% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 16 | 9 | 56% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 16 | 6 | 38% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 16 | 9 | 56% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 17 | 8 | 47% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 16 | 8 | 50% |
5 | Hangzhou | 17 | 11 | 65% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 16 | 11 | 69% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 17 | 7 | 41% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 16 | 10 | 63% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 17 | 10 | 59% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 17 | 6 | 35% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 17 | 10 | 59% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 16 | 7 | 44% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 16 | 8 | 50% |
14 | Shenzhen | 16 | 8 | 50% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 16 | 7 | 44% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 17 | 4 | 24% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 17 | 8 | 47% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 17 | 6 | 35% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Wuhan Three Towns and Guangzhou R&F have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Chinese Super League.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.