01.03.2022 - 10:00
Stadium : Sân vận động Vinh (Vinh Stadium) (Vinh)
Finished
# | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Hà Nội II | 24 | 75% | 71% | 58% | 50% | 33% | 25% | 21% | 10.04 |
2 | Sai Gon | 24 | 75% | 54% | 46% | 42% | 21% | 17% | 8% | 9.13 |
3 | Hai Phong | 24 | 54% | 46% | 46% | 33% | 29% | 25% | 17% | 9.09 |
4 | Binh Dinh | 24 | 71% | 58% | 42% | 38% | 21% | 13% | 8% | 8.92 |
5 | Song Lam Nghe An | 24 | 63% | 54% | 46% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 8% | 8.67 |
6 | Ho Chi Minh City | 24 | 67% | 54% | 42% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 4% | 8.67 |
7 | Ha Noi | 24 | 67% | 38% | 25% | 21% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 8.5 |
8 | FLC Thanh Hoa | 24 | 54% | 33% | 25% | 25% | 21% | 13% | 8% | 8.42 |
9 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 24 | 67% | 46% | 33% | 21% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
10 | Binh Duong | 24 | 63% | 33% | 25% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 4% | 7.96 |
11 | Nam Dinh | 24 | 50% | 33% | 29% | 25% | 8% | 4% | 4% | 7.71 |
12 | Viettel | 24 | 54% | 33% | 29% | 21% | 8% | 4% | 0% | 7.29 |
13 | Da Nang | 24 | 33% | 21% | 13% | 8% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 6.87 |
# | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Hà Nội II | 12 | 83% | 75% | 58% | 50% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 10.17 |
2 | Sai Gon | 12 | 83% | 58% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 17% | 0% | 9.08 |
3 | Hai Phong | 12 | 58% | 42% | 42% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 9.84 |
4 | Binh Dinh | 12 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 25% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 8.17 |
5 | Song Lam Nghe An | 12 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 8.42 |
6 | Ho Chi Minh City | 12 | 83% | 75% | 58% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 10.08 |
7 | Ha Noi | 12 | 67% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 8.59 |
8 | FLC Thanh Hoa | 12 | 42% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 7.67 |
9 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 12 | 58% | 50% | 42% | 25% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 7.66 |
10 | Binh Duong | 12 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 7.25 |
11 | Nam Dinh | 12 | 42% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 7.5 |
12 | Viettel | 12 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 25% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 8.08 |
13 | Da Nang | 12 | 25% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 6.75 |
# | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Hà Nội II | 12 | 67% | 67% | 58% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 9.92 |
2 | Sai Gon | 12 | 67% | 50% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 9.17 |
3 | Hai Phong | 12 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 0% | 8.34 |
4 | Binh Dinh | 12 | 75% | 67% | 50% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 9.66 |
5 | Song Lam Nghe An | 12 | 58% | 58% | 58% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 8.92 |
6 | Ho Chi Minh City | 12 | 50% | 33% | 25% | 25% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 7.25 |
7 | Ha Noi | 12 | 67% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 8.41 |
8 | FLC Thanh Hoa | 12 | 67% | 42% | 33% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 9.17 |
9 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 12 | 75% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 8.33 |
10 | Binh Duong | 12 | 75% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 8.66 |
11 | Nam Dinh | 12 | 58% | 42% | 42% | 33% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 7.91 |
12 | Viettel | 12 | 42% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 6.5 |
13 | Da Nang | 12 | 42% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Song Lam Nghe An | 24 | 79% | 79% | 54% | 50% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 4.96 |
2 | Ho Chi Minh City | 24 | 75% | 54% | 54% | 38% | 21% | 13% | 8% | 4.88 |
3 | Binh Duong | 24 | 71% | 25% | 21% | 13% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
4 | Sai Gon | 24 | 58% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 13% | 4% | 0% | 3.5 |
5 | FLC Thanh Hoa | 24 | 63% | 54% | 33% | 21% | 21% | 13% | 4% | 3.88 |
6 | Hai Phong | 24 | 79% | 63% | 54% | 50% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 5.67 |
7 | Da Nang | 24 | 54% | 33% | 21% | 13% | 8% | 4% | 4% | 3.04 |
8 | Ha Noi | 24 | 83% | 75% | 50% | 29% | 17% | 8% | 4% | 4.5 |
9 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 24 | 75% | 63% | 46% | 33% | 13% | 8% | 4% | 4.29 |
10 | Nam Dinh | 24 | 58% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 8% | 8% | 4% | 3.21 |
11 | Viettel | 24 | 67% | 46% | 29% | 21% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 3.71 |
12 | Binh Dinh | 24 | 63% | 54% | 46% | 29% | 17% | 17% | 4% | 4.25 |
13 | Hà Nội II | 24 | 83% | 75% | 63% | 50% | 29% | 21% | 13% | 5.58 |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Song Lam Nghe An | 12 | 92% | 92% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 25% | 8% | 5.75 |
2 | Ho Chi Minh City | 12 | 83% | 67% | 67% | 58% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 6.08 |
3 | Binh Duong | 12 | 75% | 42% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 3.75 |
4 | Sai Gon | 12 | 67% | 58% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 4.08 |
5 | FLC Thanh Hoa | 12 | 75% | 58% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 4 |
6 | Hai Phong | 12 | 83% | 75% | 67% | 58% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 6.92 |
7 | Da Nang | 12 | 67% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 3.67 |
8 | Ha Noi | 12 | 100% | 92% | 58% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 5.42 |
9 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 12 | 75% | 67% | 50% | 33% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 4.08 |
10 | Nam Dinh | 12 | 58% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 3.58 |
11 | Viettel | 12 | 83% | 50% | 42% | 25% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 4.25 |
12 | Binh Dinh | 12 | 58% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 3.92 |
13 | Hà Nội II | 12 | 92% | 92% | 83% | 67% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 6.67 |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Song Lam Nghe An | 12 | 67% | 67% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 4.17 |
2 | Ho Chi Minh City | 12 | 67% | 42% | 42% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 3.67 |
3 | Binh Duong | 12 | 67% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.58 |
4 | Sai Gon | 12 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 2.92 |
5 | FLC Thanh Hoa | 12 | 50% | 50% | 33% | 25% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 3.75 |
6 | Hai Phong | 12 | 75% | 50% | 42% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 4.42 |
7 | Da Nang | 12 | 42% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.42 |
8 | Ha Noi | 12 | 67% | 58% | 42% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.58 |
9 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 12 | 75% | 58% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 4.5 |
10 | Nam Dinh | 12 | 58% | 33% | 25% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.83 |
11 | Viettel | 12 | 50% | 42% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 3.17 |
12 | Binh Dinh | 12 | 67% | 67% | 58% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 4.58 |
13 | Hà Nội II | 12 | 75% | 58% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 4.5 |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Song Lam Nghe An | 24 | 58% | 46% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 3.71 |
2 | Ho Chi Minh City | 24 | 67% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 8% | 3.79 |
3 | Binh Duong | 24 | 79% | 67% | 54% | 38% | 17% | 13% | 13% | 4.79 |
4 | Sai Gon | 24 | 83% | 67% | 54% | 46% | 42% | 33% | 21% | 5.63 |
5 | FLC Thanh Hoa | 24 | 54% | 50% | 46% | 46% | 25% | 17% | 13% | 4.54 |
6 | Hai Phong | 24 | 50% | 42% | 29% | 21% | 13% | 4% | 4% | 3.42 |
7 | Da Nang | 24 | 63% | 46% | 25% | 21% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 3.83 |
8 | Ha Noi | 24 | 63% | 50% | 29% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 4 |
9 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 24 | 71% | 54% | 42% | 17% | 8% | 4% | 0% | 3.71 |
10 | Nam Dinh | 24 | 88% | 67% | 54% | 29% | 17% | 4% | 0% | 4.5 |
11 | Viettel | 24 | 71% | 46% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 4% | 3.58 |
12 | Binh Dinh | 24 | 79% | 63% | 54% | 46% | 29% | 4% | 4% | 4.67 |
13 | Hà Nội II | 24 | 83% | 63% | 46% | 29% | 13% | 8% | 4% | 4.46 |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Song Lam Nghe An | 12 | 42% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
2 | Ho Chi Minh City | 12 | 67% | 42% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 4 |
3 | Binh Duong | 12 | 58% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 3.5 |
4 | Sai Gon | 12 | 83% | 67% | 58% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 5 |
5 | FLC Thanh Hoa | 12 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 3.67 |
6 | Hai Phong | 12 | 50% | 33% | 25% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 2.92 |
7 | Da Nang | 12 | 42% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 3.08 |
8 | Ha Noi | 12 | 50% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
9 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 12 | 75% | 50% | 33% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 3.58 |
10 | Nam Dinh | 12 | 83% | 50% | 42% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 3.92 |
11 | Viettel | 12 | 75% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 3.83 |
12 | Binh Dinh | 12 | 75% | 58% | 50% | 42% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.25 |
13 | Hà Nội II | 12 | 75% | 50% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.5 |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Song Lam Nghe An | 12 | 75% | 58% | 58% | 42% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 4.75 |
2 | Ho Chi Minh City | 12 | 67% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 3.58 |
3 | Binh Duong | 12 | 100% | 92% | 75% | 58% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 6.08 |
4 | Sai Gon | 12 | 83% | 67% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 42% | 25% | 6.25 |
5 | FLC Thanh Hoa | 12 | 75% | 67% | 58% | 58% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 5.42 |
6 | Hai Phong | 12 | 50% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 3.92 |
7 | Da Nang | 12 | 83% | 58% | 33% | 33% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 4.58 |
8 | Ha Noi | 12 | 75% | 67% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 4.83 |
9 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 12 | 67% | 58% | 50% | 25% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.83 |
10 | Nam Dinh | 12 | 92% | 83% | 67% | 42% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 5.08 |
11 | Viettel | 12 | 67% | 42% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 3.33 |
12 | Binh Dinh | 12 | 83% | 67% | 58% | 50% | 33% | 8% | 8% | 5.08 |
13 | Hà Nội II | 12 | 92% | 75% | 67% | 42% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 5.42 |
The average number of corners for Song Lam Nghe An vs Binh Dinh can greatly help your analysis of the match, as it can point to the attacking tendencies of both teams over the course of the campaign.
Matches involving Song Lam Nghe An have averaged 8.67 corners per match during this V.League 1 campaign. They have taken 4.96 corners per match, while they concede an average of 3.71 to their opponents.
As for their upcoming opponent, Binh Dinh, their corner stats are the following:
Corners can be a valuable statistic to look into when looking at a particular match like Song Lam Nghe An vs Binh Dinh. Examining the average number of corners helps measure the offensive intent of both teams since being on the opposition half of the pitch increases the chances of winning more corners.
Corners conceded stats can also shed more light on a team’s defence and how they can capably prevent their opponents from having the ball in dangerous areas on the pitch.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.