02.09.2018 - 11:30
Stadium : University Town of Shenzhen Stadium (Shenzhen)
Finished
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Liaoning Kaixin | 30 | 73% | 43% | 27% |
2 | Yanbian Funde | 30 | 47% | 17% | 13% |
3 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 30 | 60% | 37% | 17% |
4 | Hangzhou | 30 | 67% | 33% | 23% |
5 | Shanghai Shenxin | 30 | 47% | 40% | 20% |
6 | Zhejiang Yiteng | 30 | 60% | 53% | 37% |
7 | Shenzhen | 30 | 60% | 43% | 23% |
8 | Wuhan Zall | 30 | 63% | 33% | 10% |
9 | Meizhou Hakka | 30 | 60% | 37% | 23% |
10 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 30 | 57% | 33% | 17% |
11 | Beijing BG | 30 | 30% | 13% | 10% |
12 | Nei Mongol Zhongyou | 30 | 57% | 37% | 23% |
13 | Qingdao Huanghai | 30 | 60% | 30% | 23% |
14 | Dalian Transcendence | 30 | 57% | 37% | 27% |
15 | Meizhou Meixian Techand | 30 | 60% | 33% | 17% |
16 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 30 | 63% | 40% | 30% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Liaoning Kaixin | 30 | 67% | 43% | 17% |
2 | Yanbian Funde | 30 | 50% | 20% | 7% |
3 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 30 | 57% | 40% | 13% |
4 | Hangzhou | 30 | 67% | 37% | 17% |
5 | Shanghai Shenxin | 30 | 57% | 33% | 17% |
6 | Zhejiang Yiteng | 30 | 73% | 40% | 17% |
7 | Shenzhen | 30 | 53% | 30% | 7% |
8 | Wuhan Zall | 30 | 43% | 13% | 3% |
9 | Meizhou Hakka | 30 | 63% | 27% | 13% |
10 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 30 | 63% | 40% | 10% |
11 | Beijing BG | 30 | 43% | 13% | 3% |
12 | Nei Mongol Zhongyou | 30 | 67% | 40% | 20% |
13 | Qingdao Huanghai | 30 | 53% | 27% | 13% |
14 | Dalian Transcendence | 30 | 67% | 40% | 20% |
15 | Meizhou Meixian Techand | 30 | 57% | 27% | 13% |
16 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 30 | 57% | 30% | 10% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Liaoning Kaixin | 30 | 63% | 33% | 17% |
2 | Yanbian Funde | 30 | 47% | 27% | 3% |
3 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 30 | 50% | 27% | 17% |
4 | Hangzhou | 30 | 63% | 23% | 20% |
5 | Shanghai Shenxin | 30 | 47% | 20% | 3% |
6 | Zhejiang Yiteng | 30 | 63% | 43% | 17% |
7 | Shenzhen | 30 | 63% | 50% | 27% |
8 | Wuhan Zall | 30 | 77% | 50% | 13% |
9 | Meizhou Hakka | 30 | 67% | 30% | 13% |
10 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 30 | 63% | 20% | 3% |
11 | Beijing BG | 30 | 30% | 13% | 7% |
12 | Nei Mongol Zhongyou | 30 | 50% | 23% | 3% |
13 | Qingdao Huanghai | 30 | 70% | 43% | 7% |
14 | Dalian Transcendence | 30 | 43% | 27% | 20% |
15 | Meizhou Meixian Techand | 30 | 67% | 37% | 13% |
16 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 30 | 73% | 33% | 17% |
Check out all the card statistics for Shenzhen vs Hangzhou here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for Shenzhen vs Hangzhou bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the China League One, just check out the table above.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.