30.03.2022 - 13:00
Finished
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Novara | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Caronnese | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Sestri Levante | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Chieri | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Sanremo | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Gozzano | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | Bra | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Borgosesia | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 | Casale | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | Fossano | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 | Lavagnese | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Vado | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Ligorna | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 | Derthona | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Saluzzo | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | Imperia | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 | PDHAE | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Città di Varese | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 | Asti | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 | RG Ticino | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Novara | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Caronnese | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Sestri Levante | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Chieri | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Sanremo | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Gozzano | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | Bra | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Borgosesia | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 | Casale | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | Fossano | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 | Lavagnese | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Vado | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Ligorna | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 | Derthona | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Saluzzo | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | Imperia | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 | PDHAE | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Città di Varese | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 | Asti | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 | RG Ticino | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Novara | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Caronnese | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Sestri Levante | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Chieri | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Sanremo | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Gozzano | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | Bra | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Borgosesia | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 | Casale | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | Fossano | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 | Lavagnese | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Vado | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Ligorna | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 | Derthona | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Saluzzo | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | Imperia | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 | PDHAE | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Città di Varese | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 | Asti | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 | RG Ticino | 38 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Check out all the card statistics for RG Ticino vs Imperia here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for RG Ticino vs Imperia bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the Serie D Group A, just check out the table above.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.