17.07.2022 - 01:00
Stadium : Isotopes Park (Albuquerque)
Finished
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Indy Eleven | 34 | 85% | 68% | 53% |
2 | Miami FC | 35 | 71% | 54% | 40% |
3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 37 | 76% | 57% | 41% |
4 | Phoenix Rising | 34 | 79% | 62% | 50% |
5 | Las Vegas Lights | 34 | 71% | 41% | 26% |
6 | Atlanta United II | 34 | 76% | 56% | 38% |
7 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 34 | 65% | 62% | 47% |
8 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 36 | 56% | 39% | 22% |
9 | LA Galaxy II | 34 | 85% | 79% | 62% |
10 | Sacramento Republic | 36 | 89% | 72% | 58% |
11 | Rio Grande Valley | 35 | 83% | 74% | 63% |
12 | Charleston Battery | 34 | 82% | 74% | 56% |
13 | New York RB II | 34 | 82% | 65% | 53% |
14 | Colorado Springs | 37 | 81% | 73% | 62% |
15 | Louisville City | 37 | 78% | 62% | 43% |
16 | Orange County SC | 34 | 85% | 74% | 50% |
17 | San Antonio | 37 | 84% | 76% | 59% |
18 | New Mexico United | 35 | 69% | 63% | 46% |
19 | Memphis 901 | 36 | 81% | 69% | 42% |
20 | Loudoun United | 34 | 79% | 74% | 47% |
21 | Hartford Athletic | 34 | 85% | 65% | 47% |
22 | Birmingham Legion | 35 | 80% | 63% | 46% |
23 | El Paso Locomotive | 34 | 85% | 79% | 65% |
24 | Detroit City FC | 35 | 57% | 40% | 20% |
25 | San Diego Loyal | 35 | 91% | 83% | 71% |
26 | Oakland Roots | 36 | 81% | 58% | 47% |
27 | Monterey Bay | 34 | 74% | 65% | 44% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Indy Eleven | 34 | 88% | 71% | 32% |
2 | Miami FC | 35 | 69% | 51% | 14% |
3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 37 | 59% | 43% | 19% |
4 | Phoenix Rising | 34 | 85% | 56% | 38% |
5 | Las Vegas Lights | 34 | 62% | 38% | 18% |
6 | Atlanta United II | 34 | 79% | 50% | 18% |
7 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 34 | 71% | 56% | 38% |
8 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 36 | 67% | 44% | 19% |
9 | LA Galaxy II | 34 | 88% | 65% | 41% |
10 | Sacramento Republic | 36 | 78% | 39% | 31% |
11 | Rio Grande Valley | 35 | 74% | 51% | 23% |
12 | Charleston Battery | 34 | 88% | 65% | 41% |
13 | New York RB II | 34 | 82% | 65% | 44% |
14 | Colorado Springs | 37 | 89% | 62% | 24% |
15 | Louisville City | 37 | 73% | 51% | 24% |
16 | Orange County SC | 34 | 82% | 56% | 35% |
17 | San Antonio | 37 | 81% | 54% | 35% |
18 | New Mexico United | 35 | 83% | 31% | 23% |
19 | Memphis 901 | 36 | 69% | 42% | 17% |
20 | Loudoun United | 34 | 82% | 56% | 24% |
21 | Hartford Athletic | 34 | 79% | 56% | 21% |
22 | Birmingham Legion | 35 | 77% | 40% | 23% |
23 | El Paso Locomotive | 34 | 88% | 74% | 47% |
24 | Detroit City FC | 35 | 57% | 31% | 9% |
25 | San Diego Loyal | 35 | 89% | 63% | 37% |
26 | Oakland Roots | 36 | 78% | 53% | 36% |
27 | Monterey Bay | 34 | 74% | 47% | 24% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Indy Eleven | 34 | 76% | 44% | 29% |
2 | Miami FC | 35 | 86% | 49% | 23% |
3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 37 | 76% | 54% | 27% |
4 | Phoenix Rising | 34 | 74% | 41% | 18% |
5 | Las Vegas Lights | 34 | 71% | 35% | 18% |
6 | Atlanta United II | 34 | 74% | 38% | 21% |
7 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 34 | 68% | 35% | 18% |
8 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 36 | 47% | 31% | 8% |
9 | LA Galaxy II | 34 | 88% | 56% | 47% |
10 | Sacramento Republic | 36 | 94% | 78% | 47% |
11 | Rio Grande Valley | 35 | 89% | 71% | 46% |
12 | Charleston Battery | 34 | 74% | 47% | 18% |
13 | New York RB II | 34 | 71% | 41% | 24% |
14 | Colorado Springs | 37 | 78% | 59% | 35% |
15 | Louisville City | 37 | 76% | 54% | 27% |
16 | Orange County SC | 34 | 76% | 62% | 32% |
17 | San Antonio | 37 | 92% | 65% | 38% |
18 | New Mexico United | 35 | 71% | 51% | 26% |
19 | Memphis 901 | 36 | 81% | 64% | 33% |
20 | Loudoun United | 34 | 79% | 50% | 18% |
21 | Hartford Athletic | 34 | 74% | 50% | 18% |
22 | Birmingham Legion | 35 | 80% | 57% | 31% |
23 | El Paso Locomotive | 34 | 82% | 68% | 32% |
24 | Detroit City FC | 35 | 69% | 37% | 17% |
25 | San Diego Loyal | 35 | 89% | 66% | 43% |
26 | Oakland Roots | 36 | 78% | 53% | 22% |
27 | Monterey Bay | 34 | 79% | 47% | 35% |
Check out all the card statistics for New Mexico United vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for New Mexico United vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the USL Championship, just check out the table above.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.