13.04.2023 - 22:00
Finished
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Marcílio Dias | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Vitória | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Coritiba | 4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Ponte Preta | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
5 | Atlético GO | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Santa Cruz | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | América Mineiro | 8 | 38% | 38% | 25% |
8 | RB Bragantino | 2 | 50% | 0% | 0% |
9 | ABC | 4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | Avaí | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 | Juventude | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Brasil de Pelotas | 4 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
13 | Londrina | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 | Águia de Marabá | 4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Botafogo SP | 4 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
16 | Vila Nova | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
17 | Sergipe | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Ceará | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 | América RN | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 | Náutico | 4 | 75% | 75% | 75% |
21 | São Bernardo | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 | Maringá | 4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
23 | Volta Redonda | 4 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
24 | Real Ariquemes | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 | União Rondonópolis | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 | Operário PR | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
27 | Camboriú | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
28 | Humaitá | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 | Athletic Club | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
30 | ASA | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
31 | Manaus | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
32 | Bahia de Feira | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
33 | São Luiz | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 | Vitória Futebol Clube (ES) | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
35 | Caucaia | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
36 | Retrô | 2 | 50% | 0% | 0% |
37 | Nova Mutum EC | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
38 | Fluminense PI | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
39 | Falcon | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
40 | Sampaio Corrêa | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
41 | Parnahyba | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
42 | Criciúma | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
43 | CRB | 4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
44 | Ferroviário | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
45 | Marília | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
46 | Noroeste | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
47 | São Francisco | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
48 | Botafogo PB | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
49 | Atlético Alagoinhas | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
50 | Tuna Luso | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Noroeste | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Manaus | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Vitória Futebol Clube (ES) | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Ceilândia | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Princesa Solimões | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Operário MT | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | Campinense | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Caldense | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 | Bahia de Feira | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | São Luiz | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
11 | Marília | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Democrata GV | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Marcílio Dias | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 | Juventude | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Sampaio Corrêa | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | Brasil de Pelotas | 4 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
17 | Goiás | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Volta Redonda | 4 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
19 | Nova Iguaçu | 4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 | Brusque | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 | Caucaia | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 | Fluminense PI | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
23 | Ituano | 4 | 50% | 25% | 0% |
24 | Botafogo PB | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 | CSA | 4 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
26 | Cuiabá | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
27 | Remo | 4 | 25% | 0% | 0% |
28 | Londrina | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 | Ypiranga Erechim | 4 | 75% | 25% | 0% |
30 | Nova Mutum EC | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
31 | Operário PR | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
32 | Humaitá | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
33 | Athletic Club | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 | Brasiliense | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
35 | Flamengo | 10 | 70% | 30% | 20% |
36 | Cruzeiro | 4 | 100% | 100% | 25% |
37 | Atlético MG | 4 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
38 | Athletico PR | 6 | 50% | 33% | 17% |
39 | Corinthians | 8 | 75% | 50% | 25% |
40 | Internacional | 4 | 75% | 75% | 50% |
41 | Paysandu | 2 | 100% | 50% | 50% |
42 | Tombense | 4 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
43 | Vila Nova | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
44 | ASA | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
45 | Criciúma | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
46 | São Raimundo RR | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
47 | Real Ariquemes | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
48 | União Rondonópolis | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
49 | Botafogo SP | 4 | 50% | 50% | 25% |
50 | São Bernardo | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Caldense | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Vasco da Gama | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Vitória Futebol Clube (ES) | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Tuna Luso | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Campinense | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Atlético MG | 4 | 50% | 50% | 25% |
7 | Athletico PR | 6 | 67% | 17% | 17% |
8 | Internacional | 4 | 100% | 100% | 75% |
9 | Sport Recife | 4 | 25% | 25% | 0% |
10 | Fluminense | 4 | 75% | 25% | 25% |
11 | São Paulo | 10 | 70% | 20% | 10% |
12 | Palmeiras | 6 | 67% | 50% | 50% |
13 | Coritiba | 4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 | Flamengo | 10 | 80% | 70% | 40% |
15 | Cruzeiro | 4 | 100% | 100% | 25% |
16 | Corinthians | 8 | 38% | 25% | 13% |
17 | Paysandu | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Fortaleza | 4 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
19 | Bahia | 8 | 38% | 25% | 25% |
20 | Vitória | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 | Santos | 6 | 67% | 67% | 17% |
22 | Botafogo | 6 | 50% | 17% | 0% |
23 | Grêmio | 10 | 60% | 60% | 30% |
24 | Avaí | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
25 | Chapecoense | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 | São Francisco | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
27 | Humaitá | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
28 | Athletic Club | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 | Caucaia | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
30 | Retrô | 2 | 50% | 0% | 0% |
31 | Nova Mutum EC | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
32 | Maringá | 4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
33 | Tocantinópolis | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 | Resende | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
35 | Operário MT | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
36 | Jacuipense | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
37 | Marília | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
38 | Ponte Preta | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
39 | Atlético GO | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
40 | Santa Cruz | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
41 | América Mineiro | 8 | 50% | 38% | 38% |
42 | RB Bragantino | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
43 | ABC | 4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
44 | Vila Nova | 2 | 50% | 0% | 0% |
45 | Sampaio Corrêa | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
46 | ASA | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
47 | Criciúma | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
48 | CRB | 4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
49 | Juventude | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
50 | Brasil de Pelotas | 4 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
Check out all the card statistics for Náutico vs Cruzeiro here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for Náutico vs Cruzeiro bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the Copa do Brasil, just check out the table above.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.