07.08.2022 - 11:30
Stadium : Zhengzhou Hanghai Stadium
Finished
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 48% | 39% | 21% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 36% | 18% | 3% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 36% | 21% | 9% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 45% | 33% | 21% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 61% | 55% | 33% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 45% | 30% | 15% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 21% | 9% | 3% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 36% | 15% | 9% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 42% | 30% | 15% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 39% | 21% | 9% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 52% | 39% | 12% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 39% | 33% | 12% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 52% | 42% | 12% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 36% | 24% | 3% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 30% | 12% | 3% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 48% | 30% | 21% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 42% | 33% | 15% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 52% | 33% | 12% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 58% | 33% | 15% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 52% | 24% | 6% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 33% | 9% | 3% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 58% | 30% | 15% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 58% | 39% | 27% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 48% | 24% | 6% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 24% | 12% | 3% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 27% | 15% | 6% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 55% | 21% | 9% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 42% | 33% | 9% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 55% | 36% | 12% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 36% | 18% | 9% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 58% | 24% | 6% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 42% | 12% | 3% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 48% | 18% | 0% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 52% | 33% | 18% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 39% | 15% | 6% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 52% | 30% | 12% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 45% | 21% | 15% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 36% | 12% | 3% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 48% | 24% | 9% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 67% | 18% | 6% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 67% | 42% | 9% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 55% | 36% | 15% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 27% | 15% | 6% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 42% | 21% | 12% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 42% | 24% | 6% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 45% | 12% | 3% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 33% | 21% | 9% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 58% | 39% | 9% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 45% | 33% | 12% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 52% | 21% | 6% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 30% | 12% | 0% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 42% | 18% | 9% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 48% | 27% | 21% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 52% | 30% | 15% |
Check out all the card statistics for Henan Jianye vs Beijing Guoan here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for Henan Jianye vs Beijing Guoan bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the Chinese Super League, just check out the table above.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.