13.06.2021 - 00:00
Stadium : Breese Stevens Field (Madison, Wisconsin)
Finished
# | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | New England II | 28 | 79% | 61% | 39% | 32% | 29% | 25% | 14% | 10.46 |
2 | Inter Miami II | 28 | 71% | 54% | 39% | 29% | 21% | 14% | 14% | 9.66 |
3 | North Carolina FC | 28 | 82% | 46% | 39% | 32% | 29% | 18% | 14% | 9.57 |
4 | Toronto II | 28 | 79% | 57% | 50% | 32% | 14% | 7% | 4% | 9.33 |
5 | Richmond Kickers | 29 | 72% | 62% | 41% | 31% | 21% | 17% | 10% | 9.25 |
6 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 30 | 70% | 47% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 17% | 10% | 9.14 |
7 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 28 | 75% | 50% | 32% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 9.04 |
8 | Forward Madison | 28 | 68% | 43% | 29% | 21% | 11% | 11% | 7% | 8.74 |
9 | Greenville Triumph | 30 | 60% | 47% | 27% | 20% | 17% | 10% | 10% | 8.72 |
10 | North Texas | 29 | 59% | 45% | 34% | 28% | 24% | 14% | 3% | 8.35 |
11 | Union Omaha | 30 | 50% | 43% | 37% | 20% | 17% | 10% | 10% | 8.17 |
12 | FC Tucson | 30 | 57% | 43% | 30% | 13% | 7% | 3% | 0% | 8.03 |
# | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | New England II | 14 | 86% | 64% | 43% | 36% | 29% | 29% | 7% | 10.31 |
2 | Inter Miami II | 14 | 57% | 36% | 29% | 21% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 9.07 |
3 | North Carolina FC | 14 | 86% | 43% | 43% | 29% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 9.28 |
4 | Toronto II | 14 | 79% | 57% | 57% | 43% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 10 |
5 | Richmond Kickers | 14 | 86% | 79% | 50% | 36% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 9.86 |
6 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 15 | 67% | 47% | 40% | 33% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 9.2 |
7 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 14 | 79% | 64% | 43% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 10.15 |
8 | Forward Madison | 14 | 57% | 36% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 8.15 |
9 | Greenville Triumph | 15 | 67% | 40% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 8.38 |
10 | North Texas | 14 | 64% | 50% | 36% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 8.07 |
11 | Union Omaha | 16 | 38% | 31% | 31% | 25% | 19% | 13% | 13% | 7.81 |
12 | FC Tucson | 15 | 60% | 53% | 33% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 8.14 |
# | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | New England II | 14 | 71% | 57% | 36% | 29% | 29% | 21% | 21% | 10.64 |
2 | Inter Miami II | 14 | 86% | 71% | 50% | 36% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 10.22 |
3 | North Carolina FC | 14 | 79% | 50% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 21% | 21% | 9.85 |
4 | Toronto II | 14 | 79% | 57% | 43% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 8.72 |
5 | Richmond Kickers | 15 | 60% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 20% | 13% | 8.64 |
6 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 15 | 73% | 47% | 40% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 9.08 |
7 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 14 | 71% | 36% | 21% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.92 |
8 | Forward Madison | 14 | 79% | 50% | 36% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 7% | 9.29 |
9 | Greenville Triumph | 15 | 53% | 53% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 9 |
10 | North Texas | 15 | 53% | 40% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 20% | 7% | 8.6 |
11 | Union Omaha | 14 | 64% | 57% | 43% | 14% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 8.57 |
12 | FC Tucson | 15 | 53% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 7.93 |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | North Carolina FC | 28 | 54% | 39% | 32% | 14% | 7% | 4% | 0% | 3.14 |
2 | Toronto II | 28 | 71% | 64% | 50% | 29% | 18% | 14% | 7% | 4.44 |
3 | Richmond Kickers | 29 | 76% | 62% | 45% | 24% | 17% | 10% | 7% | 4.46 |
4 | FC Tucson | 30 | 60% | 43% | 27% | 17% | 7% | 7% | 3% | 3.57 |
5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 28 | 71% | 61% | 46% | 36% | 18% | 7% | 4% | 4.62 |
6 | Greenville Triumph | 30 | 83% | 70% | 57% | 37% | 30% | 13% | 7% | 5.29 |
7 | Forward Madison | 28 | 79% | 50% | 39% | 21% | 11% | 4% | 0% | 4.07 |
8 | North Texas | 29 | 83% | 69% | 45% | 24% | 17% | 14% | 7% | 4.52 |
9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 30 | 83% | 63% | 53% | 37% | 33% | 27% | 17% | 5.75 |
10 | Inter Miami II | 28 | 71% | 54% | 43% | 18% | 11% | 11% | 7% | 4.22 |
11 | Union Omaha | 30 | 80% | 63% | 43% | 37% | 27% | 17% | 10% | 4.7 |
12 | New England II | 28 | 79% | 68% | 61% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 7% | 5.38 |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | North Carolina FC | 14 | 64% | 57% | 43% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 3.64 |
2 | Toronto II | 14 | 86% | 79% | 64% | 36% | 29% | 21% | 14% | 5.54 |
3 | Richmond Kickers | 14 | 93% | 79% | 57% | 21% | 14% | 14% | 7% | 4.86 |
4 | FC Tucson | 15 | 87% | 67% | 33% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.14 |
5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 14 | 86% | 79% | 64% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 7% | 5.46 |
6 | Greenville Triumph | 15 | 87% | 80% | 67% | 47% | 33% | 7% | 0% | 5.69 |
7 | Forward Madison | 14 | 64% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 3.77 |
8 | North Texas | 14 | 93% | 79% | 57% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 4.57 |
9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 15 | 93% | 67% | 53% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 27% | 6.4 |
10 | Inter Miami II | 14 | 71% | 50% | 43% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 4.15 |
11 | Union Omaha | 16 | 81% | 63% | 44% | 38% | 25% | 19% | 13% | 4.81 |
12 | New England II | 14 | 86% | 79% | 71% | 43% | 36% | 14% | 7% | 5.62 |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | North Carolina FC | 14 | 43% | 21% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 2.64 |
2 | Toronto II | 14 | 57% | 50% | 36% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 3.43 |
3 | Richmond Kickers | 15 | 60% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 7% | 4.07 |
4 | FC Tucson | 15 | 33% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 3 |
5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 14 | 57% | 43% | 29% | 29% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 3.77 |
6 | Greenville Triumph | 15 | 80% | 60% | 47% | 27% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 4.93 |
7 | Forward Madison | 14 | 93% | 57% | 50% | 29% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 4.36 |
8 | North Texas | 15 | 73% | 60% | 33% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 4.47 |
9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 15 | 73% | 60% | 53% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 5 |
10 | Inter Miami II | 14 | 71% | 57% | 43% | 21% | 14% | 14% | 7% | 4.29 |
11 | Union Omaha | 14 | 79% | 64% | 43% | 36% | 29% | 14% | 7% | 4.57 |
12 | New England II | 14 | 71% | 57% | 50% | 29% | 29% | 7% | 7% | 5.09 |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | North Carolina FC | 28 | 93% | 86% | 82% | 54% | 46% | 32% | 14% | 6.43 |
2 | Toronto II | 28 | 79% | 64% | 50% | 36% | 29% | 25% | 14% | 4.89 |
3 | Richmond Kickers | 29 | 79% | 59% | 52% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 7% | 4.79 |
4 | FC Tucson | 30 | 80% | 63% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 3% | 4.46 |
5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 28 | 64% | 61% | 54% | 25% | 11% | 4% | 4% | 4.42 |
6 | Greenville Triumph | 30 | 57% | 40% | 23% | 17% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3.43 |
7 | Forward Madison | 28 | 79% | 64% | 39% | 21% | 21% | 21% | 14% | 4.67 |
8 | North Texas | 29 | 79% | 52% | 28% | 17% | 10% | 7% | 3% | 3.83 |
9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 30 | 63% | 43% | 30% | 10% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 3.39 |
10 | Inter Miami II | 28 | 86% | 71% | 64% | 46% | 32% | 21% | 4% | 5.44 |
11 | Union Omaha | 30 | 63% | 43% | 30% | 10% | 7% | 3% | 3% | 3.47 |
12 | New England II | 28 | 71% | 64% | 46% | 29% | 25% | 11% | 7% | 5.08 |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | North Carolina FC | 14 | 86% | 71% | 71% | 50% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 5.64 |
2 | Toronto II | 14 | 64% | 64% | 43% | 36% | 21% | 21% | 7% | 4.46 |
3 | Richmond Kickers | 14 | 79% | 57% | 57% | 50% | 36% | 14% | 14% | 5 |
4 | FC Tucson | 15 | 73% | 53% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 14 | 64% | 57% | 50% | 29% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 4.69 |
6 | Greenville Triumph | 15 | 33% | 20% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.69 |
7 | Forward Madison | 14 | 64% | 50% | 36% | 21% | 21% | 21% | 14% | 4.38 |
8 | North Texas | 14 | 64% | 43% | 29% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 3.5 |
9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 15 | 60% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 2.8 |
10 | Inter Miami II | 14 | 71% | 50% | 43% | 36% | 29% | 21% | 7% | 4.92 |
11 | Union Omaha | 16 | 50% | 38% | 25% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
12 | New England II | 14 | 86% | 71% | 36% | 21% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 4.69 |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | North Carolina FC | 14 | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% | 50% | 36% | 21% | 7.21 |
2 | Toronto II | 14 | 93% | 64% | 57% | 36% | 36% | 29% | 21% | 5.29 |
3 | Richmond Kickers | 15 | 80% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 4.57 |
4 | FC Tucson | 15 | 87% | 73% | 53% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 4.93 |
5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 14 | 64% | 64% | 57% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 4.15 |
6 | Greenville Triumph | 15 | 80% | 60% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 4.07 |
7 | Forward Madison | 14 | 93% | 79% | 43% | 21% | 21% | 21% | 14% | 4.93 |
8 | North Texas | 15 | 93% | 60% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 4.13 |
9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 15 | 67% | 60% | 47% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 4.08 |
10 | Inter Miami II | 14 | 100% | 93% | 86% | 57% | 36% | 21% | 0% | 5.93 |
11 | Union Omaha | 14 | 79% | 50% | 36% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 4 |
12 | New England II | 14 | 57% | 57% | 57% | 36% | 29% | 14% | 7% | 5.55 |
The average number of corners for Forward Madison vs Richmond Kickers can greatly help your analysis of the match, as it can point to the attacking tendencies of both teams over the course of the campaign.
Matches involving Forward Madison have averaged 8.74 corners per match during this USL League One campaign. They have taken 4.07 corners per match, while they concede an average of 4.67 to their opponents.
As for their upcoming opponent, Richmond Kickers, their corner stats are the following:
Corners can be a valuable statistic to look into when looking at a particular match like Forward Madison vs Richmond Kickers. Examining the average number of corners helps measure the offensive intent of both teams since being on the opposition half of the pitch increases the chances of winning more corners.
Corners conceded stats can also shed more light on a team’s defence and how they can capably prevent their opponents from having the ball in dangerous areas on the pitch.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.