03.11.2022 - 07:30
Finished
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wuhan Three Towns | 34 | 76% |
2 | Shandong Luneng | 34 | 74% |
3 | Hangzhou | 34 | 68% |
4 | Shanghai SIPG | 34 | 62% |
5 | Shanghai Shenhua | 34 | 59% |
6 | Henan Jianye | 34 | 56% |
7 | Beijing Guoan | 34 | 53% |
8 | Chengdu Better City FC | 34 | 53% |
9 | Dalian Yifang | 34 | 50% |
10 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 34 | 47% |
11 | Meizhou Hakka | 34 | 44% |
12 | Changchun Yatai | 34 | 41% |
13 | Tianjin Teda | 34 | 38% |
14 | Wuhan Zall | 34 | 35% |
15 | Guangzhou R&F | 34 | 29% |
16 | Shenzhen | 34 | 26% |
17 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 34 | 21% |
18 | Hebei CFFC | 34 | 9% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Shandong Luneng | 17 | 88% |
2 | Wuhan Three Towns | 17 | 82% |
3 | Hangzhou | 17 | 71% |
4 | Shanghai SIPG | 17 | 65% |
5 | Shanghai Shenhua | 17 | 59% |
6 | Henan Jianye | 17 | 59% |
7 | Chengdu Better City FC | 17 | 59% |
8 | Meizhou Hakka | 17 | 59% |
9 | Dalian Yifang | 17 | 53% |
10 | Beijing Guoan | 17 | 47% |
11 | Tianjin Teda | 17 | 47% |
12 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 17 | 41% |
13 | Changchun Yatai | 17 | 35% |
14 | Wuhan Zall | 17 | 35% |
15 | Shenzhen | 17 | 29% |
16 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 17 | 29% |
17 | Guangzhou R&F | 17 | 24% |
18 | Hebei CFFC | 17 | 12% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wuhan Three Towns | 17 | 71% |
2 | Hangzhou | 17 | 65% |
3 | Shanghai Shenhua | 17 | 59% |
4 | Beijing Guoan | 17 | 59% |
5 | Shandong Luneng | 17 | 59% |
6 | Shanghai SIPG | 17 | 59% |
7 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 17 | 53% |
8 | Henan Jianye | 17 | 53% |
9 | Changchun Yatai | 17 | 47% |
10 | Chengdu Better City FC | 17 | 47% |
11 | Dalian Yifang | 17 | 47% |
12 | Guangzhou R&F | 17 | 35% |
13 | Wuhan Zall | 17 | 35% |
14 | Meizhou Hakka | 17 | 29% |
15 | Tianjin Teda | 17 | 29% |
16 | Shenzhen | 17 | 24% |
17 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 17 | 12% |
18 | Hebei CFFC | 17 | 6% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hebei CFFC | 34 | 91% |
2 | Shenzhen | 34 | 71% |
3 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 34 | 65% |
4 | Guangzhou R&F | 34 | 65% |
5 | Wuhan Zall | 34 | 62% |
6 | Tianjin Teda | 34 | 56% |
7 | Dalian Yifang | 34 | 47% |
8 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 34 | 44% |
9 | Changchun Yatai | 34 | 44% |
10 | Meizhou Hakka | 34 | 44% |
11 | Beijing Guoan | 34 | 41% |
12 | Henan Jianye | 34 | 38% |
13 | Chengdu Better City FC | 34 | 32% |
14 | Shanghai Shenhua | 34 | 32% |
15 | Shanghai SIPG | 34 | 32% |
16 | Hangzhou | 34 | 26% |
17 | Shandong Luneng | 34 | 26% |
18 | Wuhan Three Towns | 34 | 24% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hebei CFFC | 17 | 88% |
2 | Guangzhou R&F | 17 | 76% |
3 | Shenzhen | 17 | 65% |
4 | Wuhan Zall | 17 | 59% |
5 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 17 | 53% |
6 | Changchun Yatai | 17 | 47% |
7 | Tianjin Teda | 17 | 47% |
8 | Dalian Yifang | 17 | 47% |
9 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 17 | 41% |
10 | Beijing Guoan | 17 | 41% |
11 | Henan Jianye | 17 | 41% |
12 | Meizhou Hakka | 17 | 35% |
13 | Shanghai Shenhua | 17 | 35% |
14 | Shanghai SIPG | 17 | 35% |
15 | Chengdu Better City FC | 17 | 24% |
16 | Hangzhou | 17 | 24% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 17 | 18% |
18 | Shandong Luneng | 17 | 12% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hebei CFFC | 17 | 94% |
2 | Shenzhen | 17 | 76% |
3 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 17 | 76% |
4 | Tianjin Teda | 17 | 65% |
5 | Wuhan Zall | 17 | 65% |
6 | Meizhou Hakka | 17 | 53% |
7 | Guangzhou R&F | 17 | 53% |
8 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 17 | 47% |
9 | Dalian Yifang | 17 | 47% |
10 | Changchun Yatai | 17 | 41% |
11 | Chengdu Better City FC | 17 | 41% |
12 | Beijing Guoan | 17 | 41% |
13 | Shandong Luneng | 17 | 41% |
14 | Henan Jianye | 17 | 35% |
15 | Wuhan Three Towns | 17 | 29% |
16 | Hangzhou | 17 | 29% |
17 | Shanghai Shenhua | 17 | 29% |
18 | Shanghai SIPG | 17 | 29% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Changchun Yatai and Shanghai Shenhua in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Changchun Yatai has come out and scored the first goal in 41% of the matches they have played so far in the Chinese Super League. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 44% of matches.
Meanwhile, Shanghai Shenhua comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 59% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 32% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in Chinese Super League.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.