# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Béziers | 30 | 20% | 13% | 7% |
2 | ![]() Les Herbiers | 30 | 27% | 23% | 17% |
3 | ![]() Colomiers US | 30 | 23% | 17% | 10% |
4 | ![]() Trélissac | 30 | 17% | 10% | 7% |
5 | ![]() Bergerac | 30 | 13% | 10% | 10% |
6 | ![]() Le Puy F.43 Auvergne | 30 | 27% | 20% | 10% |
7 | ![]() Yzeure | 30 | 7% | 3% | 0% |
8 | ![]() Stade Montois | 30 | 10% | 10% | 3% |
9 | ![]() Andrézieux | 30 | 27% | 27% | 17% |
10 | ![]() Nantes II | 30 | 13% | 7% | 0% |
11 | ![]() Montpellier II | 30 | 17% | 13% | 3% |
12 | ![]() Canet Roussillon | 30 | 10% | 7% | 0% |
13 | ![]() Chamalières | 30 | 20% | 13% | 7% |
14 | ![]() Angoulême | 30 | 20% | 20% | 10% |
15 | ![]() Angers SCO II | 30 | 10% | 10% | 3% |
16 | ![]() Bourges Foot 18 | 30 | 27% | 17% | 10% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Béziers | 30 | 23% | 10% | 3% |
2 | ![]() Les Herbiers | 30 | 33% | 23% | 10% |
3 | ![]() Colomiers US | 30 | 27% | 13% | 3% |
4 | ![]() Trélissac | 30 | 17% | 7% | 0% |
5 | ![]() Bergerac | 30 | 13% | 3% | 3% |
6 | ![]() Le Puy F.43 Auvergne | 30 | 23% | 13% | 0% |
7 | ![]() Yzeure | 30 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
8 | ![]() Stade Montois | 30 | 10% | 7% | 3% |
9 | ![]() Andrézieux | 30 | 27% | 17% | 10% |
10 | ![]() Nantes II | 30 | 27% | 7% | 0% |
11 | ![]() Montpellier II | 30 | 20% | 13% | 7% |
12 | ![]() Canet Roussillon | 30 | 13% | 10% | 3% |
13 | ![]() Chamalières | 30 | 20% | 10% | 0% |
14 | ![]() Angoulême | 30 | 13% | 10% | 7% |
15 | ![]() Angers SCO II | 30 | 17% | 10% | 7% |
16 | ![]() Bourges Foot 18 | 30 | 27% | 17% | 7% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Béziers | 30 | 27% | 17% | 0% |
2 | ![]() Les Herbiers | 30 | 23% | 17% | 7% |
3 | ![]() Colomiers US | 30 | 27% | 7% | 3% |
4 | ![]() Trélissac | 30 | 23% | 10% | 3% |
5 | ![]() Bergerac | 30 | 13% | 13% | 10% |
6 | ![]() Le Puy F.43 Auvergne | 30 | 23% | 13% | 7% |
7 | ![]() Yzeure | 30 | 7% | 7% | 3% |
8 | ![]() Stade Montois | 30 | 10% | 7% | 7% |
9 | ![]() Andrézieux | 30 | 40% | 23% | 7% |
10 | ![]() Nantes II | 30 | 20% | 10% | 0% |
11 | ![]() Montpellier II | 30 | 20% | 3% | 0% |
12 | ![]() Canet Roussillon | 30 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
13 | ![]() Chamalières | 30 | 20% | 17% | 3% |
14 | ![]() Angoulême | 30 | 23% | 17% | 10% |
15 | ![]() Angers SCO II | 30 | 10% | 0% | 0% |
16 | ![]() Bourges Foot 18 | 30 | 23% | 10% | 3% |
Check out all the card statistics for Bourges Foot 18 vs Angoulême here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for Bourges Foot 18 vs Angoulême bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the National 2 Group D, just check out the table above.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.