05.01.2020 - 13:30
Finished
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Palermo | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Messina | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Savoia | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Acireale | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 | SSC Giugliano | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Cittanovese | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | Biancavilla | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Castrovillari | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 | Palmese | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | FC Messina | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 | Licata | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Marina di Ragusa | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Nola 1925 | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 | Marsala | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Roccella | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | Corigliano Calabro | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 | San Tommaso | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Troina | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Palermo | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Messina | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Savoia | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Acireale | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 | SSC Giugliano | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Cittanovese | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | Biancavilla | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Castrovillari | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 | Palmese | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | FC Messina | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 | Licata | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Marina di Ragusa | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Nola 1925 | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 | Marsala | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Roccella | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | Corigliano Calabro | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 | San Tommaso | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Troina | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Palermo | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Messina | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Savoia | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Acireale | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 | SSC Giugliano | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Cittanovese | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | Biancavilla | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Castrovillari | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 | Palmese | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | FC Messina | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 | Licata | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Marina di Ragusa | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Nola 1925 | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 | Marsala | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Roccella | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | Corigliano Calabro | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 | San Tommaso | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Troina | 26 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Check out all the card statistics for Biancavilla vs Cittanovese here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for Biancavilla vs Cittanovese bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the Serie D Group I, just check out the table above.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.