China
Super Liga China

Añadir a los Favoritos

Qingdao Jonoon vs Qingdao Youth Island

07.07.2024 - 11:35

Estadio : Qingdao Youth Football Stadium (Qingdao)

Tabla Córners Tarjetas 1ª Mitad 2ª Mitad Más / Menos Goles Portería a Cero Ambos Marcan Anota / Sufre Primero

General
Home
Visitante

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Shanghai SIPG	16	88%	81%	63%	56%	44%	38%	31%	11.82
2	Shanghai Shenhua	15	80%	80%	67%	67%	67%	40%	27%	11.8
3	Henan Jianye	16	88%	81%	81%	63%	50%	31%	13%	11.25
4	Hangzhou	16	88%	88%	75%	50%	38%	25%	19%	11.19
5	Meizhou Hakka	15	87%	80%	60%	40%	27%	20%	13%	10.73
6	Qingdao Jonoon	15	87%	80%	67%	47%	40%	33%	33%	10.66
7	Beijing Guoan	15	87%	73%	67%	47%	27%	13%	7%	10.47
8	Tianjin Teda	16	94%	69%	56%	44%	19%	13%	6%	10.32
9	Sichuan Jiuniu	16	75%	56%	50%	44%	25%	25%	19%	10.19
10	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	15	87%	80%	67%	27%	20%	20%	20%	10.13
11	Shandong Luneng	15	87%	67%	53%	40%	27%	13%	13%	10.07
12	Chengdu Better City FC	15	73%	60%	47%	33%	27%	27%	27%	10
13	Qingdao Youth Island	16	69%	50%	50%	38%	19%	13%	13%	9.81
14	Wuhan Three Towns	16	81%	63%	50%	25%	19%	13%	13%	9.75
15	Nantong Zhiyun	16	75%	56%	44%	25%	25%	13%	13%	9.19
16	Changchun Yatai	15	47%	33%	33%	27%	20%	13%	7%	8

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Shanghai SIPG	7	86%	71%	57%	57%	43%	29%	29%	11
2	Shanghai Shenhua	7	71%	71%	57%	57%	57%	29%	29%	11.15
3	Henan Jianye	9	100%	89%	89%	89%	67%	44%	22%	12.33
4	Hangzhou	9	78%	78%	78%	67%	44%	22%	11%	11.11
5	Meizhou Hakka	9	89%	78%	44%	22%	11%	11%	11%	10.11
6	Qingdao Jonoon	7	86%	71%	71%	57%	43%	43%	43%	10.86
7	Beijing Guoan	6	83%	83%	83%	33%	17%	17%	0%	10
8	Tianjin Teda	7	86%	86%	57%	57%	29%	14%	14%	11.14
9	Sichuan Jiuniu	8	88%	75%	63%	50%	38%	38%	25%	11.63
10	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	8	88%	75%	63%	13%	13%	13%	13%	9.63
11	Shandong Luneng	8	88%	75%	63%	50%	38%	25%	25%	10.88
12	Chengdu Better City FC	8	63%	50%	50%	25%	25%	25%	25%	9.25
13	Qingdao Youth Island	8	63%	38%	38%	38%	25%	13%	13%	9.5
14	Wuhan Three Towns	8	100%	88%	63%	13%	13%	13%	13%	10.63
15	Nantong Zhiyun	8	63%	38%	25%	13%	13%	0%	0%	7.5
16	Changchun Yatai	7	57%	29%	29%	29%	14%	14%	0%	8.43

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Shanghai SIPG	9	89%	89%	67%	56%	44%	44%	33%	12.44
2	Shanghai Shenhua	8	88%	88%	75%	75%	75%	50%	25%	12.38
3	Henan Jianye	7	71%	71%	71%	29%	29%	14%	0%	9.86
4	Hangzhou	7	100%	100%	71%	29%	29%	29%	29%	11.29
5	Meizhou Hakka	6	83%	83%	83%	67%	50%	33%	17%	11.67
6	Qingdao Jonoon	8	88%	88%	63%	38%	38%	25%	25%	10.5
7	Beijing Guoan	9	89%	67%	56%	56%	33%	11%	11%	10.77
8	Tianjin Teda	9	100%	56%	56%	33%	11%	11%	0%	9.66
9	Sichuan Jiuniu	8	63%	38%	38%	38%	13%	13%	13%	8.76
10	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	7	86%	86%	71%	43%	29%	29%	29%	10.72
11	Shandong Luneng	7	86%	57%	43%	29%	14%	0%	0%	9.14
12	Chengdu Better City FC	7	86%	71%	43%	43%	29%	29%	29%	10.86
13	Qingdao Youth Island	8	75%	63%	63%	38%	13%	13%	13%	10.13
14	Wuhan Three Towns	8	63%	38%	38%	38%	25%	13%	13%	8.88
15	Nantong Zhiyun	8	88%	75%	63%	38%	38%	25%	25%	10.88
16	Changchun Yatai	8	38%	38%	38%	25%	25%	13%	13%	7.63

General
Home
Visitante

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	15	47%	33%	27%	13%	7%	7%	7%	3.13
2	Shanghai SIPG	16	94%	88%	81%	81%	69%	31%	31%	7.88
3	Henan Jianye	16	100%	88%	75%	69%	44%	44%	31%	6.94
4	Hangzhou	16	81%	75%	69%	69%	50%	44%	31%	6.56
5	Beijing Guoan	15	80%	60%	60%	60%	40%	27%	13%	5.47
6	Changchun Yatai	15	60%	20%	7%	7%	7%	0%	0%	2.93
7	Shandong Luneng	15	80%	80%	80%	67%	40%	20%	20%	6.07
8	Shanghai Shenhua	15	87%	80%	67%	53%	33%	27%	27%	6.4
9	Tianjin Teda	16	81%	63%	44%	25%	19%	19%	13%	4.94
10	Meizhou Hakka	15	73%	60%	40%	20%	13%	13%	7%	4
11	Qingdao Jonoon	15	73%	60%	40%	33%	27%	0%	0%	4.33
12	Nantong Zhiyun	16	75%	44%	38%	38%	25%	25%	19%	4.38
13	Wuhan Three Towns	16	69%	50%	38%	31%	25%	25%	6%	4.19
14	Chengdu Better City FC	15	100%	93%	73%	67%	53%	33%	20%	7.07
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	16	81%	75%	56%	50%	25%	13%	6%	5
16	Qingdao Youth Island	16	69%	38%	25%	6%	6%	6%	0%	3.31

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	8	75%	50%	38%	13%	0%	0%	0%	3.75
2	Shanghai SIPG	7	86%	86%	71%	71%	71%	43%	43%	7.43
3	Henan Jianye	9	100%	100%	100%	100%	78%	78%	56%	8.89
4	Hangzhou	9	78%	67%	67%	67%	67%	56%	44%	7.11
5	Beijing Guoan	6	83%	83%	83%	83%	67%	50%	33%	7.17
6	Changchun Yatai	7	86%	29%	14%	14%	14%	0%	0%	3.57
7	Shandong Luneng	8	88%	88%	88%	75%	63%	38%	38%	7.38
8	Shanghai Shenhua	7	100%	100%	86%	57%	43%	29%	29%	6.86
9	Tianjin Teda	7	86%	57%	43%	29%	29%	29%	29%	5.71
10	Meizhou Hakka	9	78%	67%	56%	22%	11%	11%	0%	4.22
11	Qingdao Jonoon	7	86%	71%	71%	57%	43%	0%	0%	5.29
12	Nantong Zhiyun	8	63%	25%	25%	25%	25%	25%	25%	3.5
13	Wuhan Three Towns	8	88%	75%	50%	50%	50%	50%	13%	5.75
14	Chengdu Better City FC	8	100%	100%	75%	63%	50%	38%	25%	7.25
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	8	100%	100%	75%	75%	38%	13%	13%	6.13
16	Qingdao Youth Island	8	63%	38%	25%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	7	14%	14%	14%	14%	14%	14%	14%	2.43
2	Shanghai SIPG	9	100%	89%	89%	89%	67%	22%	22%	8.22
3	Henan Jianye	7	100%	71%	43%	29%	0%	0%	0%	4.43
4	Hangzhou	7	86%	86%	71%	71%	29%	29%	14%	5.86
5	Beijing Guoan	9	78%	44%	44%	44%	22%	11%	0%	4.33
6	Changchun Yatai	8	38%	13%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.38
7	Shandong Luneng	7	71%	71%	71%	57%	14%	0%	0%	4.57
8	Shanghai Shenhua	8	75%	63%	50%	50%	25%	25%	25%	6
9	Tianjin Teda	9	78%	67%	44%	22%	11%	11%	0%	4.33
10	Meizhou Hakka	6	67%	50%	17%	17%	17%	17%	17%	3.67
11	Qingdao Jonoon	8	63%	50%	13%	13%	13%	0%	0%	3.5
12	Nantong Zhiyun	8	88%	63%	50%	50%	25%	25%	13%	5.25
13	Wuhan Three Towns	8	50%	25%	25%	13%	0%	0%	0%	2.63
14	Chengdu Better City FC	7	100%	86%	71%	71%	57%	29%	14%	6.86
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	8	63%	50%	38%	25%	13%	13%	0%	3.88
16	Qingdao Youth Island	8	75%	38%	25%	13%	13%	13%	0%	3.63

General
Home
Visitante

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	15	100%	93%	87%	73%	53%	47%	20%	7
2	Shanghai SIPG	16	56%	44%	44%	31%	19%	6%	6%	3.94
3	Henan Jianye	16	75%	50%	38%	31%	31%	6%	6%	4.31
4	Hangzhou	16	75%	56%	50%	38%	19%	13%	6%	4.63
5	Beijing Guoan	15	80%	60%	53%	27%	27%	20%	20%	5
6	Changchun Yatai	15	87%	60%	33%	33%	27%	27%	20%	5.07
7	Shandong Luneng	15	73%	60%	40%	20%	7%	0%	0%	4
8	Shanghai Shenhua	15	73%	47%	47%	47%	47%	27%	27%	5.4
9	Tianjin Teda	16	88%	88%	69%	56%	31%	19%	6%	5.38
10	Meizhou Hakka	15	87%	73%	67%	60%	47%	40%	40%	6.73
11	Qingdao Jonoon	15	87%	73%	73%	67%	47%	40%	20%	6.33
12	Nantong Zhiyun	16	88%	69%	50%	44%	31%	13%	0%	4.81
13	Wuhan Three Towns	16	69%	63%	50%	50%	38%	31%	25%	5.56
14	Chengdu Better City FC	15	47%	33%	20%	20%	0%	0%	0%	2.93
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	16	75%	50%	44%	44%	25%	25%	25%	5.19
16	Qingdao Youth Island	16	94%	88%	56%	50%	38%	25%	13%	6.5

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	8	100%	88%	75%	63%	38%	25%	0%	5.88
2	Shanghai SIPG	7	43%	43%	43%	29%	14%	0%	0%	3.57
3	Henan Jianye	9	56%	33%	22%	11%	11%	11%	11%	3.44
4	Hangzhou	9	67%	44%	44%	22%	11%	11%	0%	4
5	Beijing Guoan	6	50%	33%	17%	17%	17%	0%	0%	2.83
6	Changchun Yatai	7	100%	71%	29%	29%	14%	14%	14%	4.86
7	Shandong Luneng	8	63%	38%	25%	25%	0%	0%	0%	3.5
8	Shanghai Shenhua	7	57%	29%	29%	29%	29%	14%	14%	4.29
9	Tianjin Teda	7	86%	86%	71%	71%	29%	14%	0%	5.43
10	Meizhou Hakka	9	89%	67%	56%	44%	22%	22%	22%	5.89
11	Qingdao Jonoon	7	86%	71%	71%	71%	43%	29%	0%	5.57
12	Nantong Zhiyun	8	75%	50%	38%	25%	25%	13%	0%	4
13	Wuhan Three Towns	8	63%	63%	50%	50%	25%	13%	13%	4.88
14	Chengdu Better City FC	8	38%	13%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	8	75%	63%	50%	50%	25%	25%	25%	5.5
16	Qingdao Youth Island	8	100%	88%	50%	50%	25%	13%	13%	6.5

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	7	100%	100%	100%	86%	71%	71%	43%	8.29
2	Shanghai SIPG	9	67%	44%	44%	33%	22%	11%	11%	4.22
3	Henan Jianye	7	100%	71%	57%	57%	57%	0%	0%	5.43
4	Hangzhou	7	86%	71%	57%	57%	29%	14%	14%	5.43
5	Beijing Guoan	9	100%	78%	78%	33%	33%	33%	33%	6.44
6	Changchun Yatai	8	75%	50%	38%	38%	38%	38%	25%	5.25
7	Shandong Luneng	7	86%	86%	57%	14%	14%	0%	0%	4.57
8	Shanghai Shenhua	8	88%	63%	63%	63%	63%	38%	38%	6.38
9	Tianjin Teda	9	89%	89%	67%	44%	33%	22%	11%	5.33
10	Meizhou Hakka	6	83%	83%	83%	83%	83%	67%	67%	8
11	Qingdao Jonoon	8	88%	75%	75%	63%	50%	50%	38%	7
12	Nantong Zhiyun	8	100%	88%	63%	63%	38%	13%	0%	5.63
13	Wuhan Three Towns	8	75%	63%	50%	50%	50%	50%	38%	6.25
14	Chengdu Better City FC	7	57%	57%	43%	43%	0%	0%	0%	4
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	8	75%	38%	38%	38%	25%	25%	25%	4.88
16	Qingdao Youth Island	8	88%	88%	63%	50%	50%	38%	13%	6.5