China
Super Liga China

Añadir a los Favoritos

Chengdu Better City FC vs Meizhou Hakka

29.09.2024 - 11:35

Lugar : Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park (Chengdu)

Tabla Córners Tarjetas 1ª Mitad 2ª Mitad Más / Menos Goles Portería en Cero Ambos Marcan Anota / Sufre Primero

General
Home
Visitante

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Shanghai SIPG	17	88%	82%	65%	59%	47%	35%	29%	11.82
2	Shanghai Shenhua	17	82%	82%	71%	65%	65%	35%	24%	11.71
3	Hangzhou	17	88%	88%	76%	53%	41%	24%	18%	11.23
4	Henan Jianye	17	88%	82%	82%	59%	47%	29%	12%	11.18
5	Shandong Luneng	17	88%	71%	59%	47%	35%	24%	24%	10.77
6	Qingdao Jonoon	17	88%	82%	71%	47%	41%	29%	29%	10.71
7	Meizhou Hakka	17	88%	82%	65%	35%	24%	18%	12%	10.64
8	Beijing Guoan	17	82%	71%	65%	47%	29%	18%	12%	10.53
9	Tianjin Teda	17	94%	71%	59%	41%	18%	12%	6%	10.3
10	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	76%	59%	53%	41%	24%	24%	18%	10.17
11	Qingdao Youth Island	17	71%	53%	53%	41%	24%	12%	12%	9.94
12	Chengdu Better City FC	17	71%	59%	47%	35%	29%	24%	24%	9.88
13	Wuhan Three Towns	17	82%	65%	47%	24%	18%	12%	12%	9.71
14	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	17	76%	71%	59%	24%	18%	18%	18%	9.65
15	Nantong Zhiyun	17	76%	59%	41%	24%	24%	12%	12%	9.18
16	Changchun Yatai	17	53%	41%	41%	29%	24%	18%	12%	8.59

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Shanghai SIPG	8	88%	75%	63%	63%	50%	25%	25%	11.13
2	Shanghai Shenhua	8	75%	75%	63%	50%	50%	25%	25%	11.01
3	Hangzhou	9	78%	78%	78%	67%	44%	22%	11%	11.11
4	Henan Jianye	9	100%	89%	89%	89%	67%	44%	22%	12.33
5	Shandong Luneng	8	88%	75%	63%	50%	38%	25%	25%	10.88
6	Qingdao Jonoon	8	88%	75%	75%	63%	50%	38%	38%	11.01
7	Meizhou Hakka	10	90%	80%	50%	20%	10%	10%	10%	10.1
8	Beijing Guoan	8	75%	75%	75%	38%	25%	25%	13%	10.25
9	Tianjin Teda	8	88%	88%	63%	50%	25%	13%	13%	11.01
10	Sichuan Jiuniu	8	88%	75%	63%	50%	38%	38%	25%	11.63
11	Qingdao Youth Island	9	67%	44%	44%	44%	33%	11%	11%	9.78
12	Chengdu Better City FC	9	56%	44%	44%	22%	22%	22%	22%	8.89
13	Wuhan Three Towns	9	100%	89%	56%	11%	11%	11%	11%	10.44
14	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	8	88%	75%	63%	13%	13%	13%	13%	9.63
15	Nantong Zhiyun	8	63%	38%	25%	13%	13%	0%	0%	7.5
16	Changchun Yatai	9	67%	44%	44%	33%	22%	22%	11%	9.44

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Shanghai SIPG	9	89%	89%	67%	56%	44%	44%	33%	12.44
2	Shanghai Shenhua	9	89%	89%	78%	78%	78%	44%	22%	12.33
3	Hangzhou	8	100%	100%	75%	38%	38%	25%	25%	11.38
4	Henan Jianye	8	75%	75%	75%	25%	25%	13%	0%	9.88
5	Shandong Luneng	9	89%	67%	56%	44%	33%	22%	22%	10.67
6	Qingdao Jonoon	9	89%	89%	67%	33%	33%	22%	22%	10.45
7	Meizhou Hakka	7	86%	86%	86%	57%	43%	29%	14%	11.43
8	Beijing Guoan	9	89%	67%	56%	56%	33%	11%	11%	10.77
9	Tianjin Teda	9	100%	56%	56%	33%	11%	11%	0%	9.66
10	Sichuan Jiuniu	9	67%	44%	44%	33%	11%	11%	11%	8.89
11	Qingdao Youth Island	8	75%	63%	63%	38%	13%	13%	13%	10.13
12	Chengdu Better City FC	8	88%	75%	50%	50%	38%	25%	25%	11
13	Wuhan Three Towns	8	63%	38%	38%	38%	25%	13%	13%	8.88
14	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	9	67%	67%	56%	33%	22%	22%	22%	9.67
15	Nantong Zhiyun	9	89%	78%	56%	33%	33%	22%	22%	10.67
16	Changchun Yatai	8	38%	38%	38%	25%	25%	13%	13%	7.63

General
Home
Visitante

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	17	53%	29%	24%	12%	6%	6%	6%	3.12
2	Shanghai SIPG	17	94%	88%	82%	82%	71%	35%	35%	7.94
3	Henan Jianye	17	100%	88%	76%	71%	47%	47%	29%	7
4	Hangzhou	17	82%	71%	65%	65%	47%	41%	29%	6.35
5	Beijing Guoan	17	76%	53%	53%	53%	35%	24%	12%	5.12
6	Changchun Yatai	17	65%	29%	18%	18%	12%	0%	0%	3.35
7	Shandong Luneng	17	82%	82%	82%	71%	47%	29%	29%	6.71
8	Shanghai Shenhua	17	88%	82%	71%	59%	41%	29%	24%	6.53
9	Tianjin Teda	17	82%	65%	47%	29%	24%	24%	18%	5.18
10	Meizhou Hakka	17	71%	53%	35%	18%	12%	12%	6%	3.82
11	Qingdao Jonoon	17	71%	59%	35%	29%	24%	0%	0%	4.18
12	Nantong Zhiyun	17	71%	41%	35%	35%	24%	24%	18%	4.12
13	Wuhan Three Towns	17	71%	53%	41%	35%	29%	29%	12%	4.47
14	Chengdu Better City FC	17	100%	88%	71%	65%	53%	35%	24%	7
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	76%	71%	53%	47%	24%	12%	6%	4.76
16	Qingdao Youth Island	17	71%	41%	24%	6%	6%	6%	0%	3.35

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	8	75%	50%	38%	13%	0%	0%	0%	3.75
2	Shanghai SIPG	8	88%	88%	75%	75%	75%	50%	50%	7.63
3	Henan Jianye	9	100%	100%	100%	100%	78%	78%	56%	8.89
4	Hangzhou	9	78%	67%	67%	67%	67%	56%	44%	7.11
5	Beijing Guoan	8	75%	63%	63%	63%	50%	38%	25%	6
6	Changchun Yatai	9	89%	44%	33%	33%	22%	0%	0%	4.22
7	Shandong Luneng	8	88%	88%	88%	75%	63%	38%	38%	7.38
8	Shanghai Shenhua	8	100%	100%	88%	63%	50%	25%	25%	6.88
9	Tianjin Teda	8	88%	63%	50%	38%	38%	38%	38%	6.13
10	Meizhou Hakka	10	70%	60%	50%	20%	10%	10%	0%	4
11	Qingdao Jonoon	8	75%	63%	63%	50%	38%	0%	0%	4.88
12	Nantong Zhiyun	8	63%	25%	25%	25%	25%	25%	25%	3.5
13	Wuhan Three Towns	9	89%	78%	56%	56%	56%	56%	22%	6.11
14	Chengdu Better City FC	9	100%	89%	67%	56%	44%	33%	22%	6.78
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	8	100%	100%	75%	75%	38%	13%	13%	6.13
16	Qingdao Youth Island	9	67%	44%	22%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.11

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	9	33%	11%	11%	11%	11%	11%	11%	2.56
2	Shanghai SIPG	9	100%	89%	89%	89%	67%	22%	22%	8.22
3	Henan Jianye	8	100%	75%	50%	38%	13%	13%	0%	4.88
4	Hangzhou	8	88%	75%	63%	63%	25%	25%	13%	5.5
5	Beijing Guoan	9	78%	44%	44%	44%	22%	11%	0%	4.33
6	Changchun Yatai	8	38%	13%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.38
7	Shandong Luneng	9	78%	78%	78%	67%	33%	22%	22%	6.11
8	Shanghai Shenhua	9	78%	67%	56%	56%	33%	33%	22%	6.22
9	Tianjin Teda	9	78%	67%	44%	22%	11%	11%	0%	4.33
10	Meizhou Hakka	7	71%	43%	14%	14%	14%	14%	14%	3.57
11	Qingdao Jonoon	9	67%	56%	11%	11%	11%	0%	0%	3.56
12	Nantong Zhiyun	9	78%	56%	44%	44%	22%	22%	11%	4.67
13	Wuhan Three Towns	8	50%	25%	25%	13%	0%	0%	0%	2.63
14	Chengdu Better City FC	8	100%	88%	75%	75%	63%	38%	25%	7.25
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	9	56%	44%	33%	22%	11%	11%	0%	3.56
16	Qingdao Youth Island	8	75%	38%	25%	13%	13%	13%	0%	3.63

General
Home
Visitante

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	17	100%	82%	76%	65%	47%	41%	18%	6.53
2	Shanghai SIPG	17	59%	41%	41%	29%	18%	6%	6%	3.88
3	Henan Jianye	17	71%	47%	35%	29%	29%	6%	6%	4.18
4	Hangzhou	17	76%	59%	53%	41%	24%	18%	12%	4.88
5	Beijing Guoan	17	82%	59%	53%	29%	29%	24%	24%	5.41
6	Changchun Yatai	17	88%	65%	35%	35%	29%	29%	24%	5.24
7	Shandong Luneng	17	71%	59%	41%	24%	12%	0%	0%	4.06
8	Shanghai Shenhua	17	76%	47%	41%	41%	41%	24%	24%	5.18
9	Tianjin Teda	17	82%	82%	65%	53%	29%	18%	6%	5.12
10	Meizhou Hakka	17	88%	76%	71%	65%	53%	41%	35%	6.82
11	Qingdao Jonoon	17	88%	76%	76%	71%	47%	41%	24%	6.53
12	Nantong Zhiyun	17	88%	71%	53%	47%	35%	18%	6%	5.06
13	Wuhan Three Towns	17	65%	59%	47%	47%	35%	29%	24%	5.24
14	Chengdu Better City FC	17	47%	29%	18%	18%	0%	0%	0%	2.88
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	76%	53%	47%	47%	29%	29%	29%	5.41
16	Qingdao Youth Island	17	94%	88%	59%	53%	41%	29%	12%	6.59

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	8	100%	88%	75%	63%	38%	25%	0%	5.88
2	Shanghai SIPG	8	50%	38%	38%	25%	13%	0%	0%	3.5
3	Henan Jianye	9	56%	33%	22%	11%	11%	11%	11%	3.44
4	Hangzhou	9	67%	44%	44%	22%	11%	11%	0%	4
5	Beijing Guoan	8	63%	38%	25%	25%	25%	13%	13%	4.25
6	Changchun Yatai	9	100%	78%	33%	33%	22%	22%	22%	5.22
7	Shandong Luneng	8	63%	38%	25%	25%	0%	0%	0%	3.5
8	Shanghai Shenhua	8	63%	25%	25%	25%	25%	13%	13%	4.13
9	Tianjin Teda	8	75%	75%	63%	63%	25%	13%	0%	4.88
10	Meizhou Hakka	10	90%	70%	60%	50%	30%	30%	20%	6.1
11	Qingdao Jonoon	8	88%	75%	75%	75%	50%	38%	13%	6.13
12	Nantong Zhiyun	8	75%	50%	38%	25%	25%	13%	0%	4
13	Wuhan Three Towns	9	56%	56%	44%	44%	22%	11%	11%	4.33
14	Chengdu Better City FC	9	44%	11%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.11
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	8	75%	63%	50%	50%	25%	25%	25%	5.5
16	Qingdao Youth Island	9	100%	89%	56%	56%	33%	22%	11%	6.67

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	9	100%	78%	78%	67%	56%	56%	33%	7.11
2	Shanghai SIPG	9	67%	44%	44%	33%	22%	11%	11%	4.22
3	Henan Jianye	8	88%	63%	50%	50%	50%	0%	0%	5
4	Hangzhou	8	88%	75%	63%	63%	38%	25%	25%	5.88
5	Beijing Guoan	9	100%	78%	78%	33%	33%	33%	33%	6.44
6	Changchun Yatai	8	75%	50%	38%	38%	38%	38%	25%	5.25
7	Shandong Luneng	9	78%	78%	56%	22%	22%	0%	0%	4.56
8	Shanghai Shenhua	9	89%	67%	56%	56%	56%	33%	33%	6.11
9	Tianjin Teda	9	89%	89%	67%	44%	33%	22%	11%	5.33
10	Meizhou Hakka	7	86%	86%	86%	86%	86%	57%	57%	7.86
11	Qingdao Jonoon	9	89%	78%	78%	67%	44%	44%	33%	6.89
12	Nantong Zhiyun	9	100%	89%	67%	67%	44%	22%	11%	6
13	Wuhan Three Towns	8	75%	63%	50%	50%	50%	50%	38%	6.25
14	Chengdu Better City FC	8	50%	50%	38%	38%	0%	0%	0%	3.75
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	9	78%	44%	44%	44%	33%	33%	33%	5.33
16	Qingdao Youth Island	8	88%	88%	63%	50%	50%	38%	13%	6.5